Academic writing support

ChatGPT wrote the first draft. We help with the final one.

Academic writing and expert review by real subject specialists. Whether you're starting with an AI draft, your own work, or just an assignment, we'll help you submit with confidence.

Draft review Academic editing Citation checking Research support Structure & outlining
Specialist Specialist Specialist Specialist

PhD and Master's specialists across 40+ subjects. AI writes the draft — a human still decides the grade.

What are you starting with?
soc201_final_draft.docx Tracked changes

In today's society, social media has a very big impact on measurable effect on adolescent mental health. Many studies have shown this. Twenge et al. (2018) link the 2011–2015 rise in depressive symptoms to displaced sleep and in-person contact — a mechanism, not a correlation.

Emily Carter
Emily Carter · PhD, Sociology

“Many studies have shown” with no citation is the fastest way to lose credibility. I named the study and the mechanism instead — that is what the rubric grades.

Received Reviewed Edited Ready

A real edit from a SOC 201 paper. Your document, your voice — every change tracked.

PhD & Master's
Human editors, not AI
12–24 hours
Average turnaround
40+ disciplines
Subject coverage
Always private
Confidential & secure
Subject matching

Real people behind every review

We match on discipline, not on who happens to be free. Every reviewer holds a graduate degree in the field they read.

Subject specialists 40+ specialists across 12 disciplines

Select a specialist to see a paper they reviewed.

Reviewing now
Emily Carter
PhD Sociology · University of Manchester
8 years reviewing · 4,200+ papers
Focus areas
Adolescent mental health Longitudinal survey design Displacement vs. exposure models
Sociology essay 2,140 words · Harvard

Adolescent wellbeing and social media use

Twenge (2018) records a rise in depressive symptoms across the smartphone transition. The correlation is consistent, which shows that phones caused the change.1

Displacement appears to matter more than exposure.2 Sleep and in-person contact are the clearest examples in the literature.

Review progress 2 of 5 passages addressed
1 Emily Rewritten

A correlation across one cohort doesn't establish cause. Say what it does support.

2 Emily Moved

This is your strongest point. It belongs in the introduction, not on page four.

Before / after

The things AI still misses.

Good writing is only part of a great paper. Explore real examples of how subject specialists improve reasoning, evidence, structure, and academic quality.

Editor review report · soc201_final_draft.docx
Overall 54
Citation accuracy 41%
Argument strength 58%
Structure and flow 63%
Academic tone 74%
Issues found
! One fabricated source — Smith (2023) does not exist
! Thesis states a topic instead of a claim
! Three assertions with no citation attached
! Paragraphs list points instead of building one
! Conclusion restates the introduction

Five issues that cost marks before the second page. Toggle to see the same paper after review.

Thesis & opening Tracked edit
Before · AI draft

In today's world, social media has become a very important part of modern society. There are many different opinions about whether it is good or bad. This essay will explore the various impacts of social media on young people.

After · Editor revision

Social media's defenders treat it as a neutral tool; its critics treat it as a cause. Both readings miss the mechanism. This essay argues that platform incentives — not user choice — shape adolescent attention, and that policy, not abstinence, is the appropriate response.

Editor's note: Cut hedge phrases. Replaced a topic announcement with an actual argumentative claim.
How it works

Four simple steps.

soc201_final_draft.docx · 2,140 words In review
Stage 3 of 4

Edited in tracked changes

Every source opened and checked. Weak passages rewritten by hand, not by another model. Each change carries a note.

6 citations verified, 1 fabricated
Thesis and transitions rebuilt
Proofread in progress
Assigned specialist
Specialist
M. Okafor
PhD, Sociology · 9 yrs editing
Elapsed6 h 40 min
Returned byTomorrow, 09:00
Comments14

Click any stage to see what happens there.

Why students stay with expertwriting.io

Human expertise you can see in every step.

We pair subject-specialist knowledge with real conversations, not just edits. That's why the second draft is better than the first.

Why choose expertwriting.io
Subject specialists,
not general editors
Reviewed by an expert in your field.
Clear, actionable
feedback
We explain the why, not just the what.
Confidential
and secure
Your work stays private and protected.
Same reviewer
option
Request the same expert again.
On-time,
every time
Deadlines are the promise.
Students stay
for the experience
Real conversations. Real improvement.
Dr. Emily Carter Reviewing
PhD Sociology · 8+ years
156 papers reviewed

Your argument is strong, but the evidence doesn't fully support the claim you're making.

✓ Student updated draft 2 min ago
New assignment
Psychology research paper
4,300 words · APA 7th
Assigned to Dr. Carter 12 min ago
Student question

Can you explain why this paragraph is weak?

10:24 AM
Reviewer replied

The evidence is right, but it never connects back to your thesis. Here's a stronger way to build it.

10:38 AM
Same reviewer requested

Daniel asked for Dr. Bennett again for his business dissertation.

Deadline
18 hours
Accepted
Reviewer note

Don't change your voice. Strengthen your evidence instead.

The best papers are clear, specific and well supported.

This explanation finally made my supervisor's feedback click. Worth every penny.

— Business student
Review completed
42
Comments
18
Explanations
9
Rewritten
sections
Completed 1 hour ago
Live activity right now
Engineering paper reviewed Just now
Literature review completed 3 min
Student thanked their reviewer 7 min
+ 27 more updates
Trusted by students worldwide
4.9 / 5 average ★★★★★
+2.4k

I submitted my first paper to expertwriting.io and immediately saw the difference. The feedback was detailed, kind, and actually helped me learn.

— Psychology student
FAQ

Questions students ask.

Support
Still have a question?

Talk to a real editor before you commit. No bots, no sales script.

[email protected]
Chat with an editor

It grades its own homework. Ask it to check the citations and it will confirm the ones it invented, because it has no way to open the paper and see whether page 42 says what it claims. It also can't read your rubric the way your marker will.

It grades its own homework. Ask it to check the citations and it will confirm the ones it invented, because it has no way to open the paper and see whether page 42 says what it claims. It also can't read your rubric the way your marker will.

Yes, and it's about a third of what we do. The process is identical — the editor works with whatever draft you have.

Every one. We open the source, confirm your claim is actually in it, and format it to your style guide (APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard). Fabricated references are the single most common thing we find in AI-assisted drafts.

No. Your voice is left alone unless it's costing you marks. Everything comes back in tracked changes, so if an edit sounds wrong you reject it and keep your version.

It depends where you start. With a draft: reasoning and argument, structure and transitions, citation verification and formatting, discipline-appropriate tone, and a final proofread. With notes or an outline: thesis development, structural planning, and help finding the sources the argument needs. Either way you get a clean copy, a tracked-changes copy, and a note on what changed and why.

Still worth talking to us — it's a common place to begin. A specialist in your subject helps you turn the brief and your reading into a thesis, a section-by-section outline, and an evidence plan, then reviews the draft once you've written it. You do the writing; you're not doing it alone or from a blank page.

Possibly, and we won't pretend otherwise — detectors are unreliable in both directions and flag plenty of human writing. What we fix are the things a human reader reacts to: unsupported claims, filler transitions, flat sentence rhythm, analysis that never lands.

No. We don't write essays and we don't sell pre-written work. You bring a draft; a human editor makes it worth submitting. The ideas and the argument stay yours.

Always. Your drafts are encrypted, never shared, and never used to train AI. You can delete everything from your account at any time.

Get started

Start with what you have.

Send the draft, the notes, or just the brief. You’ll get a candid read of where it stands and a quote within hours — no pitch, no commitment until you approve it.

Replies typically within a few hours · US time zones · Confidential

What do you need?
Pages
2,000 words
8
Estimated from $75
Proceed

Indicative only — you get a firm quote once a specialist has read what you sent. Nothing is charged before you approve it.